Ocean Conservancy is having a contest to raise money to save marine wildlife. My photo is in the contest. Please vote today and save our friends in the sea.
My loss is your gain. Hopefully. We’re going to discuss keeping your camera dry while photographing around splashing water this month. I want to be up front here: I am not an expert at this, as you shall quickly read! But if I can help people by having them avoid the mistakes that I made, that would be great.
Please click on the photo to see it. The algorithms for making the photo smaller seem to also make it appear blurry. Thanks!
Title: Bowling Ball Beach 2
Info: Nikon D90, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 lens, Feisol tripod, f/14, ISO 200, 10-second exposure, which makes the movement of the water look mystical. This was possibly the last photo that I took with my D90, although it looks good that a camera technician can resurrect it now.
Photography: Ken Lee
Location: Bowling Ball Beach, Mendocino County, California, USA
Shortly after I took this photo, I was splashed with water. These large round rocks in a row create odd, unexpected, and surprisingly high splashes, and even though I had a Ralph’s paper bag around my Nikon D90 camera, it still got wet.
Mistake 1: A Ralph’s plastic bag is not enough. Use something more like a Op-Tech rain-sleeve. If you don’t get one of these, you can also use a shower cap in a pinch. Save those shower caps if you stay at a hotel. There are more expensive albeit more effective options, but since we’re discussing occasional splashing water from waves, I’ll stay with these suggestions.
I wiped off the camera with a towel. It didn’t seem like that much water, so I fired up the camera again and kept shooting for another half an hour.
Mistake 2: You can’t fry your camera’s circuits if there’s no juice. Turning on the camera, in other words, can fry your circuit-board or other parts if the salt water has entered the camera.
After half an hour of shooting, my camera began failing. The shutter wouldn’t close. Or wouldn’t shoot. Then, the LED monitor began failing. I left the beach and headed back to the hotel room, realizing that I had made a mistake, and opened up the camera, taking the battery and SD card out, took the lens off, and put it in front of a heater while I called a camera store to find out what to do and began scouring the internet for tips on drying a camera.
Mistake 3: The camera salesman said that I shouldn’t put the camera in front of a heater. I never found out why. Maybe you know. I don’t. But I saw one reference on the internet for getting dirt in the camera. Now, to be fair, I had placed the camera in front of a fake fireplace, so it wasn’t blowing air. But the best way to dry a digital camera, according to the salesperson and some articles I’ve found on the internet, is to submerge it in dry (duh!) rice and keep it there for 3-7 days. Other people recommend placing the camera in a zip-loc bag with silica packets, which will also draw the moisture out. I store my microphones in containers with these.
I ran to the market and purchased some rice, emptied a bag, and completely submerged the camera, but only after I found that I had made yet another mistake, which were beginning to pile up in a relatively short period of time.
Mistake 4: Don’t forget to take off the LED cover. I had forgotten to do this, but right before I put the camera in, realized that there was moisture trapped underneath. My camera had gotten doused worse than I thought.
Now, what was worse than getting the camera wet was getting it wet with salt water. Salt water is extremely corrosive. Some people recommend that you attempt to disassemble the camera, quickly rinse all of the parts, and even more quickly dry that. Since I’m not even close to an expert, I cannot recommend this, nor have I ever done it. But the point being that if you can try and get the salt water off, that would be best.
Upon getting home, I took my camera to the local camera store. They have a reputation for good service and have a good technician. Their technician said that I had fried a circuit board, which would cost US$71 dollars, and that there would be a labor charge of about US$95. So for a little under US$170, it appears that my D90 will be resurrected. And while that’s a lot of money, it’s still cheaper than replacing it.
And for the rest of the trip, I used the Op/Tech 18″ SLR Rainsleeve with another camera while photographing the coastline near Santa Cruz, which worked well, although I had difficulty viewing the LED monitor.
Equipment: Nikon D90, Nikon 18-200mm VR II Nikkor Telephoto Zoom Lens, Nikon SB-600 Speedlight, Sto-Fen Flash Diffuser.